Today I wanted to let you know about a new and very important change in New York State Law amending the law currently known as "Leandra's Law" or the Child Passenger Protection Act.
As you should be aware, Leandra's Law imposed strict penalties on the operation of a vehicle with children in the car while intoxicated. It mandated that an ignition interlock device, or IID, be installed in the vehicle of anyone convicted of driving while intoxicated. Furthermore, if a person is convicted under the law, they will be reported to The Statewide Central Registry of Child Abuse and Mistreatment.
Recently, Governor Cuomo signed legislation to make Leandra's Law even tougher. The new law makes it a class "E" felony to drive intoxicated on a conditional license rather than just a traffic infraction, which is not a crime. Driving while intoxicated with a revoked license will remain a felony.
The law also limits the circumstances when Court can waive the installation of the IID. Now the installation can only be waived when the person swears under oath they are not the owner of any motor vehicle and will not drive during the period of the interlock restriction. If the person lies under oath, it is considered perjury, which is a felony.
Obviously, every driver should drive safely and responsibly, but contact an experienced DUI attorney in the event that you are charged with a DWI or any traffic offense.
Kevin P. McKernan is a member of the National College of DWI Attorneys.
Showing posts with label car accidents. Show all posts
Showing posts with label car accidents. Show all posts
Thursday, December 26, 2013
Updates to Leandra's Law Makes Driving Intoxicated with a Conditional License a Felony
Friday, September 27, 2013
Texting Someone You Know is Driving in New Jersey Can Now be a Crime!
Every day, millions of Americans fire off text messages to friends, family and business associates.
Now, as a result of a recent decision by the New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division, some of those texts could be used as evidence to charge them with Reckless Driving as an Accomplice. In Kubert v. Best, the Court ruled that a sender of a text message can be held liable if they knew that the recipient was driving during the time they sent the text and he or she gets into an accident.
Now, as a result of a recent decision by the New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division, some of those texts could be used as evidence to charge them with Reckless Driving as an Accomplice. In Kubert v. Best, the Court ruled that a sender of a text message can be held liable if they knew that the recipient was driving during the time they sent the text and he or she gets into an accident.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)